Wednesday, July 31, 2019

Part 2 of 4 Concerning Critique


Don’t skip the process
There is a process of natural progression to writing that shouldn’t be skipped.
Beginning writers need to learn and spend much time writing before they are ready for critique of any kind. They need to get those first (awful) stories written. They need to learn about building story arches in their work, building characters, and find out where and when backstory is appropriate. They need to find their voices and be comfortable with them. Is their tendency to narrate or write in first person? This is a different process for everyone. 
First and foremost, beginners need encouragement, direction, and much time spent actually writing and learning about writing before they are ready to move on. Going directly to critique group does no one any favors. I understand the (general?) thought prevalent – “I’ll write this (story, novel) one critique at a time.” Uh hu, sure. And after each critique, you go home and “fix” your work according to general consensus. What is left when you are done with what’s basically a cut-and-paste editing job is something completely devoid of your unique voice.
Fact: You can take your story to ten different people, which I would not advise, one right after the other and when you’re done making all their suggested changes, you will no longer recognize what you started out with.  Is this what you want? There will be enough of that if you’re lucky to get your story to an editor/publisher. Save something of yourself.


Monday, July 22, 2019

Part 1 of 4 Concerning Critique


Is Critique worth your time?  Maybe not.

People write for many reasons, and everyone is at varying degrees of education in writing, many of them self-taught. They also have many foibles, likes and dislikes about writing, which inherently, eke into their opinions of any given work handed to them.

Like the general public about art, they may not know anything, but they know what they like.  Ever heard that one before?  And chances are you’ve used that phrase one or twice.  Any given person’s opinion on anything is only valid if they have the training and experience to back it up. Opinions are not facts. Say this out loud with me: Opinions are not facts.

In order to make solid, grounded judgments on any given body of work, the person making those calls needs to know how to write well – and simply not by hearing, but they also need to know the mechanics of our language. i.e. when using colons or semi-colons is called for. Or the m-dash versus the n-dash.   New writers cannot do that. And if they were to be critiquing any work – even of other new writers, that would be a classic case of the blind leading the blind. Again, Opinions are NOT facts.   That’s the equivalent of a 12-year old critiquing someone who’s been writing for 15 years. A Waste of Time.

Next time you’re at critique, take a look around the room. Do you know anything of the person beside you who you are trusting with your manuscript? How can you know if your partner(s) have the correct amount of experience to guide you with your writing? Will you learn anything in the process? Will you learn why something works or doesn’t work?